Gleason Insurance Brokers

California commercial insurance

Builders Risk: Who Usually Buys the Policy on a New Build

Builders risk covers the physical structure during construction — but who actually purchases it (the owner, the GC, or the developer) is a decision that has to be made explicitly, not assumed.

Reviewed by David Gleason, Principal — October 11, 2026

Filed under: Coverage & Endorsements

844-97-USAVE
CaliforniaGeneral information only, not legal advice — illustrative scenarios and coverage, subject to change without notice. Content may be out of date or contain errors, and requirements vary by city, county, state, agency, project, contract, carrier and policy, among other factors; verifying what applies to your own situation is your responsibility. Full disclaimerThis page describes general concepts commonly seen in commercial insurance — not a statement of what a specific policy covers, what a particular carrier requires, or what a contract, lender, project owner or public agency will accept on any individual project. Coverage and requirements vary by carrier and policy; confirm current terms against your own issued policy or with a broker before relying on this for a specific decision.

Why this question isn't automatic

Unlike general liability, which every contractor is expected to carry on their own, builders risk is often purchased once for the entire project by a single party — typically whoever the construction lender or contract designates — rather than separately by every contractor involved.

Assuming someone else on the project already has it in place, without confirming who and to what limit, is a common and expensive gap.

Often purchased once for the whole project, not per-contractor
Lenders or the contract typically designate who buys it
Assuming someone else has it is a common gap
Confirm who and to what limit, don't assume

The case for the owner or developer purchasing it

When the owner or developer buys builders risk, coverage typically stays consistent regardless of GC or subcontractor turnover, and the owner controls the policy terms directly rather than relying on a GC's choice of carrier and limits.

This is common on larger or more complex projects where the owner has more at stake financially and wants direct control over the coverage terms.

Coverage stays consistent regardless of contractor turnover
Owner controls policy terms directly
Common on larger, more complex, owner-financed projects
Reduces dependency on a GC's own coverage choices

The case for the GC purchasing it

When the GC purchases builders risk, it's often bundled with their existing carrier relationships and can be more straightforward to administer on a single, GC-managed project, especially smaller or residential builds where the GC is the primary point of contact throughout.

This is more common on smaller projects where a single GC manages the build from start to finish without multiple owner-side stakeholders.

Often bundled with the GC's existing carrier relationships
Simpler to administer on GC-managed projects
More common on smaller or residential builds
GC remains the single point of contact for coverage questions

What actually needs to be confirmed either way

Whoever purchases it, confirm the policy names all the parties who need coverage (owner, GC, and often the lender), confirm the coverage term actually spans the full expected construction timeline with room for delays, and confirm what happens if construction runs longer than the policy term.

This should be settled and documented before construction starts — discovering a gap mid-project, after a loss, is the worst possible time to learn the coverage wasn't actually in place as assumed.

Confirm all parties (owner, GC, lender) are properly named
Confirm the term covers the full expected timeline plus a buffer
Confirm the plan if construction runs longer than expected
Settle and document this before construction starts, not after a loss

More from Coverage & Endorsements

Frequently asked questions

7 questions — start typing to filter

Who typically buys builders risk insurance?

It varies — sometimes the owner or developer, sometimes the GC, typically designated by the construction lender or the project contract. It should be confirmed explicitly, not assumed.

What happens if nobody purchased builders risk?

The structure has no coverage for damage during construction — this is a serious, avoidable gap that should be confirmed and closed before construction begins.

Does builders risk need to name the lender as well as the owner?

Often yes — construction lenders commonly require being named on the policy as a condition of the loan; confirm the specific requirement.

What happens if construction runs longer than the builders risk policy term?

Coverage can lapse right when the project is still exposed — confirm the extension process and build in a buffer rather than assuming the original term will be sufficient.

Can more than one party be named on the same builders risk policy?

Yes — it's common for the owner, GC and lender to all be named insureds or loss payees on the same policy, which is often cleaner than each party carrying separate, potentially conflicting coverage.

Does builders risk cover materials stored off-site before delivery?

Sometimes, with a specific off-site or transit endorsement — standard builders risk often only covers materials once they're at the job site, so confirm this explicitly if materials will be staged elsewhere.

What happens to builders risk coverage once the building is occupied?

Builders risk coverage typically ends at substantial completion or occupancy, whichever the policy defines first — a permanent property policy needs to be in place before that transition, not after.

Updated October 11, 2026